Stephen Brown – Topical Fruit

The Last 15 “Songs of the Summer”—According to Google Trends

With summer officially arriving on June 20, the annual debate is already heating up: what will be 2025’s Song of the Summer? While radio airplay and Billboard rankings often shape the conversation, Google Trends is offering a different lens—search interest.

The platform recently shared its list of the most-searched summer songs in the U.S. going back to 2010. These aren’t necessarily the top-charting hits or even the most critically acclaimed. Instead, they’re the tracks that captured the collective curiosity of Americans enough to get them typing into search bars. And what the list reveals is as much about cultural shifts as it is about musical tastes.

Here’s the full rundown:

2010: “Love the Way You Lie” – Eminem feat. Rihanna

2011: “Super Bass” – Nicki Minaj

2012: “Mercy” – Kanye West

2013: “Blurred Lines” – Robin Thicke feat. Pharrell

2014: “Fancy” – Iggy Azalea

2015: “The Hills” – The Weeknd

2016: “Panda” – Desiigner

2017: “Despacito (Remix)” – Luis Fonsi & Daddy Yankee feat. Justin Bieber

2018: “In My Feelings” – Drake

2019: “Old Town Road” – Lil Nas X feat. Billy Ray Cyrus

2020: “WAP” – Cardi B feat. Megan Thee Stallion

2021: “Fancy Like” – Walker Hayes

2022: “Running Up That Hill” – Kate Bush

2023: “Try That in a Small Town” – Jason Aldean

2024: “Not Like Us” – Kendrick Lamar

Beyond the music itself, the list paints a fascinating picture of evolving media consumption and pop culture touchstones. Songs like “Old Town Road” and “WAP” became inescapable thanks in part to TikTok virality. Meanwhile, Kate Bush’s 1985 single saw a stunning resurgence in 2022 after being featured in Stranger Things.

One intriguing pattern? A clear rhythm of country hits rising to the top in odd-numbered years: 2019’s genre-blending “Old Town Road,” 2021’s TikTok-born “Fancy Like,” and 2023’s polarizing “Try That in a Small Town.” If the trend continues, 2025 could be another big year for country—or at least for country-infused pop.

Could Morgan Wallen snag the spotlight? Or will a dark horse—maybe a viral indie track or nostalgic throwback—surprise everyone?

If history tells us anything, it’s that the Song of Summer rarely follows a predictable formula. That’s part of the fun. So keep your playlists refreshed and your TikTok feeds open—the next big hit might be just a chorus away.

Starbucks’ Most Expensive Order Costs $45 and Will Probably Kill You

For most of us, “splurging” at Starbucks might mean opting for oat milk or adding a shot of espresso. But one TikTok user recently redefined indulgence—and perhaps common sense—by constructing what might be the most expensive single Starbucks drink ever, ringing up at an astonishing $45.

The viral stunt didn’t involve secret ingredients or off-menu magic. Instead, it was all done through the Starbucks app, where the user maxed out every customization option available. The drink? A Frankenstein-esque version of a Venti Matcha Crème Frappuccino, with caffeine levels that would make a cardiologist flinch.

Here’s what went into the $45 creation:

Base: Venti Matcha Crème Frappuccino – $6.25

Espresso shots: 12 standard + 12 affogato-style – $30

Sauces & toppings: Mocha, dark caramel, caramel drizzle, caramel crunch, chai, Frappuccino chips – $3.70

Powders: Four scoops each of vanilla bean and chocolate malt – $1.00

Whipped cream: Free (mercifully)

Grand total: $41.55 before tax—easily crossing the $45 mark depending on your location.

To be clear, this drink was never actually consumed. According to the creator, the experiment was meant to test how high the app’s customization feature could push a drink’s cost. Still, it’s a jarring reminder that with great customizability comes great responsibility—or at least a sense of financial and physiological caution.

Let’s break this down: 24 shots of espresso in a single beverage isn’t so much a drink as it is a full-blown dare. The FDA recommends no more than 400 milligrams of caffeine per day. This drink clocks in at roughly 1,500 mg—nearly four times the daily limit for an adult.

While it might sound absurd, there’s little doubt someone will eventually take the challenge, if they haven’t already.

Nutella Adds a New Flavor—for the First Time in Over 60 Years

In a world where food collabs keep getting weirder (mustard ice cream, anyone?), Nutella just dropped a flavor announcement that’s almost suspiciously sane.

After more than six decades of sticking to its iconic hazelnut-chocolate spread, Nutella is finally adding a new flavor to its U.S. lineup. And the big, bold, groundbreaking ingredient?

Peanuts. Just… peanuts.

The new version, aptly named Nutella Peanut, combines peanut butter with the OG hazelnut and cocoa blend.

Sure, it might not be the kind of viral monstrosity we’re used to seeing in the snack aisle—looking at you, pickled cotton candy—but that’s kind of the point. It’s classic, cozy, and makes way more sense than most food mashups floating around right now.

Still, don’t clear a space in your pantry just yet. Nutella Peanut won’t hit store shelves until spring 2026. Which means you’ve got a full year to dream about it, forget about it, or maybe start your own DIY version at home.

Nutella, made by Italian company Ferrero, hasn’t changed much since its debut in 1964. The original has been a toast-topper, pancake drizzle, and straight-from-the-jar indulgence for generations. This peanutty remix marks the brand’s first U.S. flavor extension in its 61-year history.

So far, the internet’s reaction is somewhere between “about time” and “that’s it?”

Some folks are pumped to see peanut butter finally join the Nutella party. Others are wondering why it took six decades to try something this obvious.

Either way, it’s a rare move for a brand that’s always played it safe—and that alone makes it worth watching. Whether Nutella Peanut becomes your new go-to or just a limited fling, one thing’s for sure:

2026 is looking delicious.

The “Human Dog Food” Diet Is Going Viral—But Should You Try It?

Another day, another TikTok trend—this time, it’s the “human dog food” diet, and yes, it’s exactly as unappetizing as it sounds. But before you assume someone’s raiding their pup’s bowl, rest assured: no actual pet food is involved.

The trend kicked off when a TikTok user went viral for showcasing his minimalist meal prep: a hearty mix of chicken, tofu, chopped veggies, and rice, all cooked into a soft, beige mash that he eats for every meal. The look? More “canine cuisine” than culinary masterpiece. The nickname “human kibble” stuck, not because of what’s in it—but because of its repetitive, utilitarian nature.

Despite its dog dish aesthetic, some viewers are eating it up. Fans praise the simplicity and efficiency of the diet, claiming it streamlines their routine, cuts down decision fatigue, and helps them stay on track with healthy eating.

One meal, one prep session, minimal thought required. But health experts are less enthused.

Nutritionists warn that the diet’s biggest flaw may be the very thing that makes it appealing: its monotony. Eating the same thing every day can quickly sap enjoyment from meals, making it harder to stick to in the long run. Even worse, a lack of variety can create nutritional blind spots. Over time, even a “balanced” mix of protein, grains, and vegetables might fall short on certain vitamins and minerals your body needs.

“There’s value in routine,” says one dietitian, “but your body thrives on variety.”

That doesn’t mean the concept is entirely off-base. Batch-cooking nutritious meals is a smart strategy for anyone trying to eat healthier with less effort. The key, experts say, is to use the “kibble” model as a baseline—maybe for lunch—and then inject more diversity at breakfast and dinner to keep both your body and brain engaged.

As for whether humans should eat like dogs? That depends on the goal. Simplicity and consistency can be powerful tools, but unlike dogs, we’re wired to crave variety and flavor. So if your weekday lunch resembles something from a pet aisle, fine. But your body—and your taste buds—will thank you for mixing it up occasionally.

@myfoodisme2
@myfoodisme
♬ original sound – thisismyfood

Morgan Wallen Explains Why He Left ‘SNL’ So Abruptly—And It’s Not That Deep

Country music star Morgan Wallen is clearing the air after sparking fan speculation with an abrupt post-show exit from Saturday Night Live—and despite the buzz, there’s no drama to unpack.

Wallen performed as the musical guest on SNL last month, but what caught fans off guard wasn’t the songs—it was his absence during the show’s customary curtain call. As host and cast gathered on stage to wave goodbye, Wallen was already wheels up, later posting “Get me to God’s country” from the tarmac. Cue the internet theorizing.

Questions started flying: Was he upset with the show? Did something go wrong backstage? Was there tension with the cast?

In a new interview with Barstool Sports’ Caleb Pressley, Wallen finally put those rumors to rest. His explanation? “No,” he said when asked if SNL had ticked him off. “I was ready to go home. I had been there all week.”

That’s it. No feuds, no walk-offs, no behind-the-scenes drama—just a guy who’d had enough of New York City.

Wallen’s laid-back clarification likely won’t surprise longtime fans.

Still, the moment offers a reminder of how quickly fan speculation can spiral online. In a social media landscape where every move is scrutinized and meme-ified, even a simple early flight can fuel a viral frenzy.

For now, Wallen’s back on tour, and SNL moves on to its next guest. As for that final wave with the cast? Sounds like Wallen’s happy to leave the arm-flailing to the city folk.